Last week, one of the biggest scandals surrounding our increasingly incompetent mayor broke. It appears that he owes nearly $240,000 in back federal income taxes, and a lien has been placed on his personal property. By all accounts, this is a last resort by the IRS, and it means that the problem has been going on for years, and that numerous notices were sent to him, which presumably were ignored. How did this come to light? I’m sure Bob Gammon would love to take credit. But in reality, it was Charles Pine, public safety advocate and activist, and my predecessor in suing the City over Measure Y abuses. Apparently he happened to be at the County Recorder’s office and on a lark, checked the records, and lo and behold - scoop of the year! Which makes me wonder - why does it take gadflies like Pine to get the information we citizens need in order to police our own government?
Students of 18th century western civilization may recall the quote of British politician Edmund Burke, referring to the press gallery, “Yonder sits the Fourth Estate, and they are more important than them all.” Without an effective Fourth Estate, public and private power cannot be held accountable. Of course, litigation can be effective, but it is a slow and expensive process. A well researched and well timed piece of investigative journalism can accomplish desired goals (like removing corrupt or inept politicians from office) way quicker and more effectively.
But where are our local investigative reporters? Where are the hard questions? Where is the real analysis? Where are the biting editorials? Is the local media so concerned about maintaining its political correctness, and perhaps offending readers, that it has forgotten its obligation to society as a whole? The issues raised in my lawsuit highlighted fundamental questions about our elected officials’ integrity and commitment to the law, about competence, and about accountability. My lawsuit involved, and still does involve, tens of millions of dollars - far more than the infamous “Negotiated Settlement Agreement.” And yet, the press coverage has not been what it should have been. Now, of course, I’m sure every activist trying to promote his or her cause may complain about the same thing, but I found the coverage positively anemic. The questions that most reporters asked me were pretty lame, if they bothered to even call me at all. Some of the issues involved are kind of complicated, but so what? You think analyzing the health care reform bills is easy? All the more reason the media should analyze the issues more carefully, to come up with more incisive questions, so that we are all better informed.
Our current mayor bungles an officer’s name at a funeral. Subsequently, officers killed in the line of duty specifically ask that Dellums not speak at their funerals. He can’t manage to drive himself to work. He refuses to make his calendars public, and when he finally does, they reveal he is frequently unaccounted for. In his over two years as mayor, he has apparently accomplished nothing, other than preside over one of the biggest budget disasters in history. His wife sticks to him like glue and intimidates and alienates his detractors. His answer to sideshows: make them legal. And now this - he’s up to his eyeballs in debt, and appears not to open his mail, or understand it. And the only person publicly connecting the dots - Charlie Pine! (www.orpn.org). Okay, so whether the mayor has dementia is a sensitive subject. But if he can’t function, shouldn’t the press be looking into this? Or somebody?
Our local newspapers complain about declining circulation and depressing revenues. But here the emperor is marching down the street naked, the little boy is saying, "the emperor is wearing no clothes," and it doesn't even make page five! If the papers aren't doing their job, why should we pay for them? Go dig for the real news like you used to, deliver us a quality product, with critical analysis, not just parroting of press releases, and maybe we’d be willing shell out a few more sheckels. Remember, without Clark Kent, there can be no Superman.
Sunday, November 8, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hi Marleen. I agree completely. My issues have been occurring lately at the Public Ethics Commission through a series of complaints about undisclosed lobbying. I’ve filed some complaints and a complaint was filed against me. Through all of this, I don’t recall a single Oakland Tribune, Chronicle, or SFGate story – not even a reporter. The East Bay Express is the only media outlet keeping tabs on Oakland’s PEC.
ReplyDeleteEqually as bothersome has been the lack of interest from the general public. Attendance is usually fewer than 6-7 people at the PEC and it’s usually the same people. The only time more showed up is when Carlos Plazola and Oakland Builders Alliance brought their attorneys and developer friends to rant about a complaint against Plazola. They were successful in bullying the PEC into ignoring and burying important documents and facts about Plazola and friends.
With the media ignoring the PEC, some bloggers have attempted to address PEC issues. However, blogging about the PEC typically devolves rather quickly into mudslinging rants. I’ve given up blogging about the PEC because I usually end up being trashed by uninformed and biased bloggers who don’t follow the issues or attend the PEC meetings.
There are several important things going on with regard to public ethics. Currently, our lobbyist registration law is not being enforced. It’s too long to go into here, but that’s the status. In lieu of this, the PEC is amending the lobbyist registration act.
Also, the PEC is considering visitor sign-in sheets and online calendars for City officials.
We are also having difficulty with a PEC commissioner who has serious conflicts. These are due to the fact that his register domestic partner is also a registered lobbyist AND a public official. The Mayor’s office rejected this commissioner as a candidate a year ago because of these very conflicts. He got on the PEC, anyway.
Yes, we need Clark Kent…
Marleen, I agree entirely with your comments. We have no more local press coverage. As a result citizens don't even know how the process works! They don't know how to affect change or realize that when they actually take action it can often work! (though just as often it might not, it's worth trying).
ReplyDeleteOccasionally the Tribune has a good "My Word" column, but that is citizen based, kind of a printed blog. It's not the actual journalists doing any work. Occasionally the Trib will have a good series but it is so seldom to be non-existent.
I am curious about your thoughts about the recent My Word re. the MYOC: http://www.insidebayarea.com/opinion/ci_13755593
LG: Thanks for bringing the column to my attention. I was particularly interested to find out about a HIGH SCHOOL student appointed (apparently by Nancy Nadel) to the MYOC. OMG! (As they say in high school). Anyway, I spoke to Mr. Sirdu (the author) and we shared MY horror stories, so I'm glad to hear it's not just me who cares about government accountability. I'm following up with the City on how this high school student got appointed. More to follow.
ReplyDeleteYou're welcome.
ReplyDeleteHave you ever tried asking committee members directly? Just curious what they might say. The article seems to imply they're not too happy about any of this...
I am not nearly as charitable in my views about the MYOC. See some of my earlier posts. Sorry, but if some private citizen takes hundreds of her hours of spare time to try to recover millions of dollars that it was their job to protect in the first place, they should be contacting me, not the other way around. I have been to at least three of their meetings and got a cold reception every time. I have asked them to call me, and they never have. They are nothing but window dressing in my opinion.
ReplyDeleteWhat about the financial and spending issues he mentions? Is your suit to narrow re. the OPD mis-spending to include these? Even if so, could it be broadened?
ReplyDeleteOr maybe they're concerned about getting in the middle of a lawsuit...
ReplyDeleteI've heard some of them have been trying to do good things and are pretty frustrated with what's going on. So the only reasons I can think they wouldn't want to talk with you are the above, they don't necessarily know who you are (unless of course you're speaking), or they're so up to their eyeballs in the frustrations of trying to make a difference.
Just speculation. I would think they'd want to speak with you too! But I do think some people have good reasons that are sometimes hard to know without a conversation...
I just looked at your Sept. 30th post, about the Audit, MYOC, etc.. It seems they're giving you tons of partial answers. Are you sure they're not just trying to drown you in paperwork? Like if you have to re-ask the same questions 20 times, try to keep track of the part answers, putting them together, etc.
ReplyDeleteNow I'm sure this is a usual legal tactic (& I hope they have special software to help organize all the part answers) but on your own dime they might figure it's easier to get rid of you. Can't the judge say enough...